Kṣetra Kṣetrajña Vibhāga Yoga

13.16

machine-aligned; two human reviews pendingKrishna

Sanskrit · Devanagari

अविभक्तं च भूतेषु विभक्तमिव च स्थितम्। भूतभर्तृ च तज्ज्ञेयं ग्रसिष्णु प्रभविष्णु च ॥

Sanskrit · IAST

avibhaktaṃ ca bhūteṣu vibhaktamiva ca sthitam bhūtabhartṛ ca tajjñeyaṃ grasiṣṇu prabhaviṣṇu ca

English witness

Kashinath Trimbak Telang, 1882
Not different in (different) things, but standing as though different, it should be known to be the supporter of (all) things, and that which absorbs and creates (them). It is the radiance even of the radiant (bodies)

This verse-level alignment is machine-assisted and awaits two independent human checks. Confidence signal: 17%.

Supplied witnesses

Compare readings

29 translations and commentaries are aligned to this verse. Choose up to three; the root verse and Telang witness stay above them.

Commentary · Sanskrit

Śaṅkarācārya

Read chapter →

।।13.17।। --,अविभक्तं च प्रतिदेहं व्योमवत् तदेकम्। भूतेषु सर्वप्राणिषु विभक्तमिव च स्थितं देहेष्वेव विभाव्यमानत्वात्। भूतभर्तृ च भूतानि बिभर्तीति तत् ज्ञेयं भूतभर्तृ च स्थितिकाले। प्रलयकाले गृसिष्णु ग्रसनशीलम्। उत्पत्तिकाले प्रभविष्णु च प्रभवनशीलं यथा रज्जवादिः सर्पादेः मिथ्याकल्पितस्य।।किञ्च? सर्वत्र विद्यमानमपि सत् न उपलभ्यते चेत्? ज्ञेयं तमः तर्हि न। किं तर्हि --,

Alignment
machine-validated; human review pending
Checksum
134879e5632f
Translation · English

Rāmānuja

Read chapter →

13.17 Though the entity called the self is present everywhere in the bodies of divinities, men etc., It is 'undivided' because of Its form being that of the knower. However, to those who are ignorant, It appears divided, by such forms as those of divinities etc. - 'I am a divinity,' 'man' etc. Though the self can be contemplated by way of co-ordinate predication as one with the body in such significations as, 'I am divinity, I am a man,' It can be known as being different from the body, because of Its being a knower. That is why it has already been pointed out at the beginning: 'He who knows It? (13.1). Now Sri Krsna says that It can be known as different also on other grounds - as the 'supporter of elements' etc. Because It supports the earth and other elements combined in the shape of the body, the self can be known as being different from the elements supported. The sense is that It can be known as a separate entity. Likewise, It is that which 'devours', namely, the consumer of physical food etc. Because, It 'devours' the food, It can be known as an entity different from the elements. It causes 'generation' - It is the cause of transformation of consumed food etc., into other forms like blood etc. As eating, generating etc., are not seen in a corpse, it is settled that the body, an aggregate of elements, cannot be the cause of devouring food, generating of species and supporting them.

Alignment
machine-validated; human review pending
Checksum
c628c752172e
Commentary · English

Swami Sivananda

Read chapter →

13.17 अविभक्तम् undivided? च and? भूतेषु in beings? विभक्तम् divided? इव as if? च and? स्थितम् existing? भूतभर्तृ the supporter of beings? च and? तत् That ज्ञेयम् to be known? ग्रसिष्णु devouring? प्रभविष्णु generating? च and.Commentary Brahman must be regarded as That which supports? swallows up and also creates all beings? in the three forms of Brahma who creates the world of names anf forms? Vishnu who preserves or sustains? and Rudra who destroys. It is undivided in the various bodies. It is like ether. It is allpervding like space (Akasa). It is indivisible and the One? but It seems to divide Itself in forms and appears as all the separate existing things and beings. It is essentially unbroken. Yet? It is? as it were? divided among all beings.It devours this world during the cosmic dissolution. It generates it at the time of the origin of the next age. It supports all beings during the period of sustenance of this world.Just as fire is hidden in the wood? so also Brahman is hidden in all bodies. Just as the one space appears to be different through the limiting adjuncts (pot? house? etc.) so also the one indivisible Brahman appears to be different through the limiting adjuncts (the body? etc.). (Cf.XVIII.20)An objector says The knowable Brahman? the Knower of the field? is allpervading. It exists everywhere and yet It is not perceived. Therefore It must be of the nature of darkness or Tamas.The answer is No. It cannot be.What? then It is the Light of Lights.

Alignment
machine-validated; human review pending
Checksum
fec307fde58a

These supplied texts come from the pinned VedicScriptures dataset under GPL-3.0 and await independent alignment review.

Record integrity

Provenance

Canonical ID
gita.13.16
Corpus version
gita-1.0.0-rc.1
Text review
machine-cross-checked; two human passes pending
Devanagari and IAST digital witness
vedic-scriptures · BG13.17
English translation witness
telang-1882 · Chapter 13; aligned against BG13.17
SHA-256
f66e9d225945facd4132eb5a7370b30d1111f3872f75e9e595a85eebdc0bafee